Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Rumormill: Lexus LF-A... Stillborn?
Ford reveals 2010 Mustang badge
REPORT: Chrysler may sell Dodge Viper rather than kill it
Audi develops R8 GT3 racer
Moscow 2008: The Models of Moscow
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Nissan Murano
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Dodge Journey R/T
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Jeep Compass Sport 4x2
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Porsche Carrera S
First Drive: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
B @ Jan 18th 2006 10:20PM
GM has spent more than $100 billion on R&D in the last 25 years. For this we get the Aztek, Impala, Cimarron, LeSabre and every other uninspired lack of innovation. The other auto makers aren't much better. (The lunar space program also cost $100 billion but spawned whole new industries and technologies.)
Some rinky dink startup comes up with a 330mpg car when we get high oil. Doesn't speak well for innovation in the auto industry.